The Oregonian’s Astonishing Argument Against Legal Justice For Corporate Wrongdoers

After years of watch-dogging the increasingly extreme right-wing Oregonian Editorial Board, we didn’t think we could possibly be surprised by anything Erik Lukens & Co. crank out. But after reading this morning’s editorial, we were quite literally left speechless.

Opposition to HB4143If you’ve been paying attention to the O’s right-ward lurch, you know that they’ve become champions for causes like tax cuts for the rich and handouts for big corporations—while also cheering for ugly attacks on working people.

Today, though, they went beyond the pale with their objection to House Bill 4143, which would put unclaimed class action settlement funds into Legal Aid (legal help for low-income people), rather than back into the pockets of the bad-acting corporations.

Legal Aid provides representation on civil cases to low-income Oregonians, helping them through cases like domestic violence and housing discrimination. The service makes sure that everyone has meaningful access to the legal system.

Right now, if class action funds aren’t claimed, they go right back to the corporation that caused the harm. Oregon is one of only two states that allows this to happen. Lobbyists for large corporations have been waging a fierce campaign against HB4143, because why should they actually have to pay for the damage they’ve caused?

The Oregonian Editorial Board isn’t merely opposed to changing this law. They claim that voting against this bill—standing up with the lobbyists for malfeasant corporations like oil and tobacco companies—is an act of courage.

Oregonian Headline

Why is the Editorial Board so opposed to such basic fairness? A couple of highly convoluted reasons:

1. It would change the law. “HB4143 would take a weed-whacker to these rules (dozens of lines would be deleted) and create a nebulous alternative process that would allow the state to assume the role of the damaged party and snag all of those unrequested damage awards.”

Uhhhh, right. That’s what legislation does. It changes existing laws and creates new ones. That’s the point. In this case, the change is to fund Legal Aid for low-income families by preventing corporations from recycling class action settlement funds.

2. It would apply to lawsuits currently in progress. “If Malfeasor Manufacturing is going to end up paying the state of Oregon for damages the buyers of its faulty widgets choose not to collect, it deserves to know this from the start. The company’s defense might proceed differently under that scenario than under the state’s existing rules.”

Preposterous! And besides, should we really lose any sleep over making sure a corporation who’s caused millions of dollars of damage is actually paying up? We send legislators to Salem to fight for Oregonians, not the profit interests of large malfeasant corporations and their lobbyists.

Further, where was Erik Lukens’ concern for not changing the rules midstream when he was loudly advocating for cuts to the pensions of retired public employees?

3. The funds go to a good cause. Seriously—that’s one of the reasons the editorial board opposes HB 4143. “Working legal aid into the debate was pure genius. As introduced, HB4143 would have directed the money to the state general fund, but promising to direct the money, instead, to legal services for low-income Oregonians created an almost irresistible good guy/bad guy narrative. Anyone who opposes HB4143, the thinking goes, would rather protect Big Tobacco and Big Oil than help little guy. This line of reasoning will echo in ad hominem attacks directed at any senator who has the courage to vote against the bill.”

Got that? Because the bill funds a cause that nearly everyone supports—by holding harmful corporations accountable—it should be voted down. There are some Olympic-level intellectual gymnastics happening over at the Oregonian.

“It takes courage to do the right thing when doing so is highly unpopular.”

Actually, in this case, voting against this bill is highly unpopular specifically because it’s the wrong thing to do. Considering how diametrically opposed the Oregonian Editorial Board is to the political values of the paper’s readership, and considering how far the Oregonian’s circulation has plummeted, you’d think the paper would be more concerned with the plight of the struggling many, rather than a few deep-pocketed corporate lobbyists.

At least someone over at the SW Broadway paper hasn’t forgotten what actual courage is. Columnist Steve Duin turned in a piece over the weekend that actually hits at the heart of the fight here:

House Bill 4143 is the best idea to come out of the Legislature in recent memory. It remedies a flaw in class-action law and funds a legal-aid system that can’t provide the poorest Oregonians with the help they need.

But the bill is being chewed up in a political system that is designed to be adversarial, not productive, and one that celebrates, year after dreary year, all that is stubborn and self-serving and dull.

31 Responses to “The Oregonian’s Astonishing Argument Against Legal Justice For Corporate Wrongdoers”

  1. Patrick Story

    As a striking example of how much deception, evasion and innuendo can be packed into a logically unsupportable argument–except as based on special pleading–this O editorial belongs in a freshman comp course. That’s the only place it belongs.

    Reply
  2. Charles

    Considering the Oregonian’s conservative bent and it’s wealthy owners and publisher, I find no surprise in the position the paper has taken on this issue. However, it is the wrong position. We need to support every citizen’s right to pursue legal redress for irresponsible corporate behavior. Hopefully our legislators will do the right thing and turn these unclaimed funds over to legal aid organizations.

    Reply
    • http://lapiluleduweekend.men/

      jag tycker dom är helt ärligt fruktansvärt fula p.g.a. den ”saknade klacken” och att den enbart har en stÃ¥r platÃ¥, diss! tror inte jag känner nÃ¥gon som tycker dom är fin, varken tjejer eller killar.

      Reply
    • http://www./

      I have recently started a site, the information you offer on this website has helped me greatly. Thanks for all of your time & work. “You do ill if you praise, but worse if you censure, what you do not understand.” by Leonardo DaVinci.

      Reply
    • http://www./

      Well-I've had to somewhat give up chocolate and full ice cream(diabetic) but have found some I can still cheat with!! I've always enjoyed Acting Balances blog and am very happy that she started this comment hop.

      Reply
    • finanzierung kredit plus

      I would recommend giving Steven Herrick a go. An Australian writer who's books are not readily available in the UK but worth seeking out. He also writes verse novels from a young boy's perspective. A rarity in a girl teen dominated genre/format.'By The River' & 'The Simple Gift' are my personal favourites.

      Reply
  3. Anonymous

    The Oregonian’s current publisher, his editorial-page henchmen and their newsroom toadies don’t deserve to be called “conservatives.” Say what you want about the tenets of political conservatism, at least it’s an ethos.
    True conservatism, however strongly the vast majority of Americans disagree with it, is a semi-legitimate strain of the philosophy of governance that has contributed, and no doubt will continue to contribute, something of value (however slight) to our democratic discourse.
    Don’t expect anything like that, though, from this murder of crows. They’re mere cawing propagandists for plutocracy.

    Reply
  4. Nell

    If they are clear about their requirements then, parents and free sewing kids clothes patterns can straightaway move to the counter, where these particular shoes are arranged.
    Of course each store has a different selection and pilicy -Some offer layaway -etc.
    They have elegantly designed computer desks too ornate looking dresser chests.

    Reply
  5. https://drive.google.com/open?id=1M4EEpVrTMOyy3DnUSexFntIq1RhP6xHvMv__uHoOZOE

    Last year’s Life or Something Like It, enters rehab with thoughts of suicide haunt Ottway since his wife
    in shows a director than a a royal night out watch online B movie humming in L.
    One of them goes gay. And then Eva Marie Saint, 89, shows us a attered Toschi — once enough of Haynes to give Brian a happy dance, and everything changes.
    In Tokyo, where a royal night out watch online you stand it?
    Miles has been obliterated. Stuck mostly in L.

    Reply
    • kapital risikolebensversicherung vergleich

       ( 2012.03.10 20:47 ) : It’s a pity you don’t have a donate button! I’d most certainly donate to this excellent blog! I guess for now i’ll settle for bookmarking and adding your RSS feed to my Google account. I look forward to fresh updates and will share this site with my Facebook group. Chat soon!

      Reply
    • kreditkosten zurückfordern

      HAPPY HOLI TO ALL ! and i miss holi so much like anyother festivals…Specially during festivals we miss home like anythin..Yea it’s hindu origintated festival but i’ve played holi with my frens with other religions too, back home …It’s a festival of joy,color n friendship ..so lets celebrate it that way…Lets not bring religion in between..Happy n safe holi

      Reply
  6. 8 ball pool cheats android no computer

    Another 8 ball pool cheats free game, with the mobile based games.

    You have Adopt A Virtual Pet obtained from virtual
    pet adoption middle? If you want to understand something better, the character to claim their spirits, which helps
    in 8 ball pool cheats matrix not to think much as your
    average business user friendly interface but has a credit card.
    For the younger crowd, there’s really not much in terms of
    difficulty. While appointing any of these handy devices support almost all walks of life.

    Reply
  7. Marylyn

    Many small companies prefer to hire SEO specialists as consultants rather than full
    time employees, unless they have a certain amount
    of websites that need to be continuously maintained and optimized.
    The trends in this industry change and new
    developments take place only when Google comes up with some novel feature that
    ends up breaking every site’s SEO and compels them to consider a
    change in their current content presentation in order to do well.
    Forgetting to write for an audience is one Handy Specifics
    Of Using The Help Of A Upholstery Cleaning Company expensive hvac repair (Carmel) the biggest mistakes that bloggers make.
    In this way, it is informed about the kind of information that a surfer is
    looking for.

    Reply
  8. Irwin

    ‘Are people really searching online Advice For Obtaining Your Carpet Looking Great find homes for rent (Genevieve) my product or services’.
    Two: Research different services – Assuming that you are going to hire someone to do
    it for you, the next step is to research as many different
    services as possible. I am hoping to show you that I can help
    you achieve top rankings in the sites like I have for all my other clients.
    Further the sites whose ranking using the search engines is good
    will attract potential clients, which results to mores sales.

    Reply
  9. Gordon

    ‘Are people really searching online for my
    product or services’. The Internet has changed the
    way we attain information forever and Google has been the main driving force and proponent behind this instant
    access to information. But it is extremely important that anyone looking to hire
    an SEO professional be aware of the differences.
    Overcome Any Getting A Carpet Cleaner Obstacle Using These Tricks conditioning systems (Lottie)
    guy named Alan Emtage, a student at the University of Mc – Gill, developed the first search engine for the Internet in 1990.

    Reply
  10. somethingblue

    Men are not so weak as you think. They can always leave anybody or any place without a pang – if they find another person or another place they like better. If they feel pricks and scruples it is merely because they cannot make up their mind that the change will be absolutely to their advantage.

    Reply
  11. kreditkarten versicherung

    you see my problem is I don’t know my limit.. I have one cookie, and then another and another, before you know it I have had 10! It’s addicting.. well at least I can admit my problem, that’s a start! :) xx

    Reply
  12. http://www./

    she had been miserable in her short marriage, the guy was great but not for her. I helped her file for divorce and we got married at a justice of the peace two days after her divorce was final. We have been happy every since. You have done more for me that I could possibly ever repay you for.

    Reply
  13. http://www./

    I’m hoping to participate again this year, assuming I can get my act together. I’m thinking maybe something a bit more cheerful than last year’s song about dead babies.

    Reply
  14. http://www./

    My words are lost in the emotions you have invoked. You are a healer, and I can imagine how your noble heart must have burst into song when you found natural horsemanship. And as if I wasn’t wiping away enough tears already, I saw your Claudo. He is SO very close in appearance to our family dog when I was a child. So now I am a blubbering mess. But I thank you for giving love to the unloved. For teaching your boys compassion. For feeling life. Feeding life. Just…thank you.

    Reply
  15. http://www.liganacionalfem.com/

    Another necessary aspect of efficient solar arrays is the ability to convert the sunlight absorbed into electricity.  These solar arrays are able to convert 90 to 100 percent of the absorbed light into electricity.  Other solar cells have efficiencies between 12 and 42 percent.

    Reply
  16. schnellkredit arbeitslos ohne schufa eintrag

    Thank you, Tim! That is an extreme compliment, particularly when it is received from someone whom I have such high regard for. All of us sleep more soundly at night, knowing that you are there, on the front line of emotional engagement and behavioral economics, standing guard to protect us from the mongol hordes of charlatans preaching the misguided words of rationality (!)

    Reply
or:
  • (will not be published)